...On Movies
A perspective on movies
Monday, April 27, 2015
"Why is it always me?" - Neville Longbottom
So, this post is actually quite over due. But, I finally watched Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. While I was surprisingly impressed with the Sorcerer's Stone, my reluctance with the Chamber of Secrets proved to be merited.
Flat out, the Chamber of Secrets was annoying, tedious, predictable and very silly. I get that it sets up the story for future events, but it doesn't change the fact that Dobby is a ridiculously annoying character, a Whomping Willow seems to be a pointless creation from the mind of Rowling, we could see that Myrtle was the one that was killed by Voldemort, and a flying car seems like a HUGE plot hole. I mean, if they have a flying broom, why wouldn't they just use that to get to Hogwarts... AND WHAT'S UP WITH THE CAR LEAVING AND COMING BACK ON ITS OWN!?!?!?!?!?
Don't even get me started on Moaning Myrtle... *Sigh*.
Ultimately, I regret watching this movie and anyone who ever recommends this movie as "Great" to me has lost all credibility, as far as I'm concerned.
The one redeeming quality is that John Williams' score is still as inspiring as any of other of his works. It's memorable and has a way of achieving the intended tone.
Disagree with me? Please tell me why in the comment section.
...And don't forget to subscribe.
Friday, April 3, 2015
"It's Levi-OOOOH-sa not LevioSAR..."
So, I finally watched the Sorcerer's Stone. Not as bad as I was expecting (considering it is 14 years old). I have to admit I actually *sigh* enjoyed the movie. The CGI was obviously dated (Even for 2001), but still entertaining for a children's movie. The story was pretty fun and the kids that portrayed the characters did a very good job bringing them to life. While not on my Top 10 list (maybe not even top 25) it is a decent film.
Here are my give and takes:
The Good:
1. Daniel Radcliffe really does look like the illustrated harry potter.
5. It is super quotable!
The Bad:
1. The kids, while I understand are still young, are terrible at acting out hesitance. During scenes where they have to "Stutter" out of shock or fear, they sound forced. A minor set back, but noticeable nonetheless. Don't judge me! I was thinking it throughout the whole movie!
2. SPOILER: There were some plot twist that weren't anticipated. I genuinely thought that Snape was the villain and didn't suspect Quirrell (I thought his stutter was just a poor attempt by the actor just as the kids were bad... I now see it was all an act). However, there were many predictable moments in the movie. You know Harry is going to be assigned Gryffindor house in spite their attempt at building the anticipation... You know Gryffindor is going to win the Quidditch match... You know that "He-whom-must-not-be-named" will not kill harry (C'mon, there are 6 more books)... And the list goes on.
3. It's not super original. Hmm.. An orphan, left with his aunt and uncle who treat him poorly, grows up and a sage comes to reclaim him so he can take his rightful place as leader/her/savior. His parents left him a small fortune to ensure he has the resources he needs. He befriends a half-wit and goody-two-shoes and chooses them over a more confident antagonist... This has Batman, Cinderella, Annie, Spider-man, and the Wizard of Oz written all over it!
4. What's up with Ron using "wicked" as a phrase? Isn't this thing suppose to take place in the past??
The Ugly:
The entire time I watched this movie and Draco appeared, I couldn't help but think of this:
Here are my give and takes:
The Good:
1. Daniel Radcliffe really does look like the illustrated harry potter.
2. The Character development was very nice by comparison. You do get a sense of how Draco is going to be a pain in Harry's side from the moment they meet. You instantly feel the connection between Harry and Ron. Hermione gets on your nerves, but you can't help feel appreciative for her. And Harry's yearning for his parents and the righteous desire to avenge them was felt from the moment he steps in front of that mirror. Over all, the characters are very easy to understand and sympathize with.
3. SPOILER: Ron's heroism, while out of character, did not feel like "lazy writing" or a cheap attempt at a "twist." You can see that Ron, while not the most competitive person, is a very good tactician and realizes that what is necessary isn't quite always what is easy.
4. Quidditch looks awesome! 'Nough said.
5. It is super quotable!
The Bad:
1. The kids, while I understand are still young, are terrible at acting out hesitance. During scenes where they have to "Stutter" out of shock or fear, they sound forced. A minor set back, but noticeable nonetheless. Don't judge me! I was thinking it throughout the whole movie!
2. SPOILER: There were some plot twist that weren't anticipated. I genuinely thought that Snape was the villain and didn't suspect Quirrell (I thought his stutter was just a poor attempt by the actor just as the kids were bad... I now see it was all an act). However, there were many predictable moments in the movie. You know Harry is going to be assigned Gryffindor house in spite their attempt at building the anticipation... You know Gryffindor is going to win the Quidditch match... You know that "He-whom-must-not-be-named" will not kill harry (C'mon, there are 6 more books)... And the list goes on.
3. It's not super original. Hmm.. An orphan, left with his aunt and uncle who treat him poorly, grows up and a sage comes to reclaim him so he can take his rightful place as leader/her/savior. His parents left him a small fortune to ensure he has the resources he needs. He befriends a half-wit and goody-two-shoes and chooses them over a more confident antagonist... This has Batman, Cinderella, Annie, Spider-man, and the Wizard of Oz written all over it!
4. What's up with Ron using "wicked" as a phrase? Isn't this thing suppose to take place in the past??
The Ugly:
The entire time I watched this movie and Draco appeared, I couldn't help but think of this:
Do you agree with me? What did you think of of The Sorcerer's Stone?
Please comment and don't forget to subscribe.
Thursday, March 26, 2015
"Just when I thought you couldn't be any dumber..."
Have you ever watched a movie because a reviewer gave it "5 stars" or someone gave it "Thumbs up" only to find yourself questioning whether this person saw the same film you just did?
How about when you go to the theater with a group of friends and after coming out of the show, they're talking about how terrible the movie was and you bite your tongue because you thought it was an instant classic.
Well, we're going to look at my top 10 polarizing films of the last 30 years.
I'm not saying that I like or dislike all of the films on this list. I'm just saying that these films have a split audience of people that loved them and people that wish they could sue for having lost about 2 hours of their time.
We're going to start with number...
10. Anchor Man
For some people, this movie made about as much sense as paying for sand at the beach. But for others, the plot and credibility of this film is irrelevant to the laughable quotes and ridiculous dialogue. I know dozens of people that still quote it to this day and I have people that "sigh" at the mention of its name.
___________________________________________________________
9. Avatar
The most resounding criticism this movie gets is the claim that it is a rip-off "Pocahontas" or "Dances with Wolves." Whatever your feelings might be, there's no denying the ground breaking special effects that this film brought.
___________________________________________________________
8. Signs
So, an advance, intelligent, extraterrestrial race decides to take over a planet where 70 percent of the surface, the atmosphere and even the beings that indwell it are made up of the one substance that is hazardous to them? Okay, buddy. Yeah, that sounds like a solid plot.
___________________________________________________________
7. Death Proof
For the avid Tarantino fan, this movie is right up their alley. It has subtle humor, gore, and a whole lot of 70's technology mocking. For those that don't get Tarantino's style, this movie was confusing, disturbing and awkward.
___________________________________________________________
6. Cloverfield
This film was supposed to revolutionize the thriller/horror genre. The entire movie is taken from a first person camera angle. Whether you love or hate the story, be ready for some crazy motion sickness!
___________________________________________________________
5. Iron Man 3
Plot twist can make or break a film, but when you take the protagonists arch-enemy and turn him into Austin Powers, you're going to upset some people. To put into perspective for those that don't think it's a big deal, imagine if half way through the Dark knight, the Heath Ledger's joker wasn't really the bad guy but he was actually some actor hired by the scare crow to send Batman on a wild goose-chase.
___________________________________________________________
4. The Village
The second entry by Mr. Shyamalan on this list. The thing about plot twist is if they're too far fetched you end up loosing your audience and just upsetting them. Was it really necessary to make it modern time? Wouldn't it have worked just fine with the elders being the monsters? Oh, well.
___________________________________________________________
3. Into the Woods
This one holds a little close to the chest for me. I sincerely made an effort to try and like this movie. I was frustrated in the theater and kept thinking, WHEN IS THIS GOING TO END!?!?
___________________________________________________________
2. The Room
"The Room" has been dubbed the "Citizen Kane of bad movies." It is SO terrible that it's actually entertaining. However, many people fail to see the point of the watching it because it's terrible. It wasn't meant to be a comedy, but somehow you can't stop laughing.
___________________________________________________________
1. Napoleon Dynamite
Was there ever any doubt? I've seen friendships end because of this movie. I've seen fights ensue because of a T-shirt someone is wearing. All I can say is that I remember stepping out of the theater and thinking to myself "What was that?!?" only to find myself quoting it with my friends and laughing about it 10 minutes later.
Do you agree with my list? What movies make you scratch your head? Please comment below.
Monday, March 23, 2015
"...I hate you so much it makes me sick; it even makes me rhyme. I hate it, I hate the way you're always right!"
So, there are certain movies that I avoid just out of plain principle. Last night, I had a movie night with a few friends their girlfriend/wives and the topic came up. I explained that I refused to watch any of the Harry Potter films strictly out of principle, to which my friend Dusty said: "You have a blog! About Movies! You can't refuse to watch movies when you have a blog!"
To which I replied: "Dang it! You're right! I hate that you're right!"
So, I've made a commitment to... *Sigh*... Watch all EIGHT Harry Potter movies.
DON'T RUSH ME! Let me take my time! LOL
My friend Jimmy said he'd bring them over and we'd watch one or two at a time, so while I'm not looking forward to it, my next few movie reviews will likely be about either "The Sorcerer's Stone" and/or "The Chamber of Secrets"
Please pray for me.*gulg*
*Disclaimer: All quotes of the actual event noted above are paraphrased and intended for comedic effect (Happy, Dusty?)
To which I replied: "Dang it! You're right! I hate that you're right!"
So, I've made a commitment to... *Sigh*... Watch all EIGHT Harry Potter movies.
DON'T RUSH ME! Let me take my time! LOL
My friend Jimmy said he'd bring them over and we'd watch one or two at a time, so while I'm not looking forward to it, my next few movie reviews will likely be about either "The Sorcerer's Stone" and/or "The Chamber of Secrets"
Please pray for me.*gulg*
*Disclaimer: All quotes of the actual event noted above are paraphrased and intended for comedic effect (Happy, Dusty?)
Friday, March 6, 2015
"Frankly My Dear..."
So, I finally watched Gone with the Wind (#6 on AFI's top 100 Films of all time). I must say, while it isn't my particular cup of tea in regards to the genre, it's hard to admit that it isn't a good movie.
When one reviews a movie that was filmed decades ago, one cannot simply judge the performance by today's standards. After all, at the time when this movie was filmed, the transition from Stage to film was fairly recent, so a lot of what the actors' experiences were likely from theater.
By today's standards the acting was very corny and felt like an amateur's performance, but one should not hold that against the film as it was a different time. Now that I've gotten that out of the way, here are a few notes on what I liked and disliked from the film starting with...
Dislikes:
(WARNING: SPOILER ALERT)
Now onto the "Likes":
(Again, WARNING: SPOILERS!)
I mean, talk about a roller coaster. You get the feeling that things are going well, then BOOM! War breaks out and Scarlet is left a widow... things start to improve, then BOOM! Atlanta is attacked and O'hara has to flee back home to Tara which has been desolated... She resolves to do anything it takes to help her and her family's situation and she's actually shown as a mature, intelligent young lady... then BOOM! She steals her sister's fiance and marries him for his money... She Marries Rhett and they have a daughter, things are shaky but when she miscarries a baby, it seems like they're going to try to make things work.... then BOOM! Their daughter falls of her horse and snaps her neck (I almost got choked up at this point in the film).... I mean, the entire story line really does keep you interested.
The film is quite frankly one of the most relateable movies I've ever watched. Who hasn't experience the heartache of having your romantic feelings not reciprocated? Who hasn't felt the pain of financial trouble? Who hasn't had struggles in marriage? And how many of us don't cringe at the thought of losing a child? While many of the themes in the film are specific to the time, many of its elements are still situations that people encounter today. From social status, to infidelity, there is something for everyone to relate. But how many movies do we know that are 75 years old and are still being referenced in popular culture and being memed.
What are your thoughts on the film? Let me know in the comment section.
When one reviews a movie that was filmed decades ago, one cannot simply judge the performance by today's standards. After all, at the time when this movie was filmed, the transition from Stage to film was fairly recent, so a lot of what the actors' experiences were likely from theater.
By today's standards the acting was very corny and felt like an amateur's performance, but one should not hold that against the film as it was a different time. Now that I've gotten that out of the way, here are a few notes on what I liked and disliked from the film starting with...
Dislikes:
(WARNING: SPOILER ALERT)
1. Civil War with no war?
The film takes place during the entirety of the Civil War, yet not a single battlefield was shown. What's up with that? Maybe it's the fact that over the generations since this film's release, more and more films portraying the gruesomeness of war have made me feel that a battle scene in movie taking place during a war is essential.
2. Scarlet O'Hara gets on my last nerve!
I get that the character was always meant to be portrayed as a stuck-up southern bell that does whatever she needs to accomplish her intended goal... but did Vivien Leigh have to portray her so whiny and annoying?
3. It was just too stinking long!
Admittedly, I didn't watch the movie all in one sitting. It was too long and I can't justify sitting in front of the TV for 4 hours straight for the same movie. Again, I understand that it was a different time, but just like "Dragon Ball Z" came up with "Dragon Ball Z Kai" BECAUSE they realized there was too much fluff in the stories, why can't they make a "Special edition straight-to-the-point-21st-century-edition" Gone with the wind? I mean, I can think of several scenes that I would eliminate and the story would work just as well.
4. Was the writer of the film a Confederate?
Granted, I really don't know very much about the history of the script, but it seems to me like the North is constantly portrayed as a bunch of looting, raping, savage, unmerciful bunch of scoundrels. There is hardly any talk regarding slavery during the film. Even after the emancipation of slaves, most of them stay on to serve in the house as employees (which may or may not have been the case in most house-holds of the time), the confederacy is portrayed as the noblemen and the northerners as invasive conquerors that are there only to gain the favor of black people so that black people would vote republican. It made me raise an eye brow more often than I'm used to during a historic flick.Now onto the "Likes":
(Again, WARNING: SPOILERS!)
1. The story itself was great!
"That's a good movie" |
2. Talk about a quotable movie!
I can see why the top rated movie quote in AFI's "100 years... 100 Movie quotes" number one quote is from Gone with the wind. I mean, there are several quotes from the film that are themselves part of popular culture. From "After all, tomorrow is another day" to "I'll never be hungry again" to "Frankly my dear, I just don't..." this movie has several memorable dialogues that have cemented their place in film history.
3. For lack of a better word, the film is timeless.
The film is quite frankly one of the most relateable movies I've ever watched. Who hasn't experience the heartache of having your romantic feelings not reciprocated? Who hasn't felt the pain of financial trouble? Who hasn't had struggles in marriage? And how many of us don't cringe at the thought of losing a child? While many of the themes in the film are specific to the time, many of its elements are still situations that people encounter today. From social status, to infidelity, there is something for everyone to relate. But how many movies do we know that are 75 years old and are still being referenced in popular culture and being memed.
4. Rhett Butler is an OG!
After everything he's seen his wife do, after all of he went through to get her to be his... when it came down to it, the fact that it took rejection from the man she always loved EVEN AFTER HIS WIFE DIED in order for Scarlet to realize that she would never have this man that she adored and Rhett Butler was the man for her, he'd had enough. His daughter was gone, and Scarlet put him through so much, that he basically said "screw this. I'm out."What are your thoughts on the film? Let me know in the comment section.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
“Movies are a fad. Audiences really want to see live actors on a stage.” - Charlie Chaplan
So, I've considered myself a pretty big movie buff... I REALLY enjoy movies, not just for the entertainment of it all, but also the artistry, imagination, work and time that it takes to make a good film.
A long time ago (years ago, really) I set out to watch all the films on AFI's Top 100 films of all time. I've had years to complete the list and I've only had a chance to watch 31 of these films. Embarassingly, I haven't even watched some of the more High Profile movies on the list like "Citizen Kane", "Casa Blanca", or even "Gone with the Wind" (Which I own!).
Fortunately, a movie hasn't been added since 2001, and I doubt they'll make any new additions in the next ten years... hopefully that gives me a chance to watch the rest of the list pretty soon.
So, I'm going to set out to watch the other 69 films. I'll be updating this list as I get an opportunity to watch them and hopefully check them off the list before I hit 40! LOL Okay, so I have just over a decade to watch 69 films... CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
A long time ago (years ago, really) I set out to watch all the films on AFI's Top 100 films of all time. I've had years to complete the list and I've only had a chance to watch 31 of these films. Embarassingly, I haven't even watched some of the more High Profile movies on the list like "Citizen Kane", "Casa Blanca", or even "Gone with the Wind" (Which I own!).
Fortunately, a movie hasn't been added since 2001, and I doubt they'll make any new additions in the next ten years... hopefully that gives me a chance to watch the rest of the list pretty soon.
So, I'm going to set out to watch the other 69 films. I'll be updating this list as I get an opportunity to watch them and hopefully check them off the list before I hit 40! LOL Okay, so I have just over a decade to watch 69 films... CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)